MENGEMBALIKAN KHALIFAH

1. Umat Islam sekarang sudah sampai ke peringkat cemas dan bahaya. Bahayanya bukan hanya kepada diri mereka tetapi kepada agama mereka. Ini adalah oleh kerana agama Islam sudah di hijack oleh pihak tertentu yang mengganti ajaran Islam sebenar dengan ajaran yang bertentangan dengan Islam. Apabila ajaran ini dikembangkan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin yang berkepentingan, ulama dan umarak enggan membantah, bahkan ada yang agak tertarik dengan ajaran-ajaran ini. Dengan sikap ini agama Islam akan menjadi lain daripada Islam yang diwahyukan kepada Nabi oleh Allah s.w.t.

2. Demikian, walaupun Al Quran dengan jelasnya melarang orang Islam membunuh, terutamanya membunuh orang yang seagama dengan mereka, tetapi kita lihat ramai orang Islam yang percaya dan sanggup secara sukarela menyertai gerakan membunuh sesama Islam sebagai jihad. Dan ramailah orang Islam yang telah dibunuh oleh orang Islam berbanding dengan yang dibunuh oleh Yahudi. Sesungguhnya mereka mengkhianati Islam dan memihak kepada Zionis.

3. Dari Malaysia juga sudah ada sukarelawan yang pergi ke Syria kerana ingin berperang, iaitu membunuh orang Islam lain. Mereka menghalalkan perbuatan mereka dengan mendakwa bahawa yang hendak dibunuh ialah orang Islam yang menganuti fahaman Syiah. Mereka berpendapat puak Syiah tidak Islam.

4. Kita tahu dalam acara pengislaman, yang diwajibkan ialah lafaz dua kalimah syahadah, iaitu “La illaha illallah Muhammadurasullallah”. Hanya dengan lafaz ini mencukupi untuk seseorang menjadi orang Islam.

5. Mereka yang dianggap bukan Islam ini bukan sahaja mengucap dua kalimah syahadah, tetapi mereka menerima dan membaca Al Quran yang sama, bersolat dengan menyebut nama Allah dan Rasulnya, menolak yang haram serta menerima yang halal, dan tidak menyekutu Allah atau menyembah berhala. Kafirkah mereka?

6. Islam mengutamakan keadilan. Untuk melaku adil pihak yang dituduh kafir perlu diberi peluang, jika tidak dibicara dengan tertib, sekurang-kurangnya untuk membela diri, untuk menentukan amalan dan kepercayaan mereka bertentangan dengan Islam atau tidak.

7. Tetapi tanpa diperiksa dan ditentukan kafir atau tidak mereka yang ditawan dibunuh dengan kejam.

8. Orang Syiah juga bersalah apabila membunuh orang Sunni tanpa diadili.

9. Hari ini ramai juga orang Islam Malaysia yang telah pergi ke Syria yang percaya mereka berjihad. Berjihadkah mereka apabila mereka melakukan kerja Yahudi dan Amerika?

10. Sekarang terdapat sekumpulan orang Sunni yang sedang berperang menawan wilayah Iraq dan Syria kononnya untuk mendiri negara Islam pimpinan Khalifah. Mereka ini melakukan tindakan ganas dengan menembak mati askar tawanan mereka dan juga untuk pancung leher seorang tawanan mereka rakyat Amerika. Kononnya mereka berjihad untuk Islam, untuk mendiri sebuah negara Islam yang diketuai oleh Khalifah. Sebenarnya apa yang dilakukan oleh mereka ialah melemahkan orang Islam supaya lebih mudah dikuasai oleh Yahudi dan Amerika.

11. Ulama dan umarak Islam di negara ini tidak dengan tegas menyatakan pendirian mereka, samada percaya tindakan ganas yang dilakukan oleh kumpulan ini adalah sebahagian dari ajaran Islam atau tidak. Ada yang dipercayai merestukan sukarelawan Malaysia pergi membunuh orang Islam yang dikatakan tidak Islam. Ada yang percaya mereka ini berjihad bila membunuh orang yang tidak sama tafsiran dan kepercayaan Islam dengan mereka walaupun orang ini menyembah Tuhan yang sama dan mengucap akan Allah yang satu dan Muhammad adalah RasulNya. Tidak ada usaha mengkaji dan membahas tuduhan kafir orang ini walaupun tuduhan ini amat berat. Tidak ada fatwa yang dibuat oleh ulama yang tidak beragenda atau berkepentingan, yang pegang hanya kepada Al Quran dan hadis yang sahih.

12. Jika fahaman seperti ini merebak di negara ini maka perpecahan di kalangan orang Islam akan jadi lebih luas daripada sekarang. Ia mungkin sampai tahap bermusuh dan bertindak ganas. Janganlah kita fikir ini tidak akan berlaku di negara bertuah ini. Ingatlah disatu masa dahulu ada diantara kita mengkafir sesama kita dan berlatih untuk mengguna senjata yang dicuri. Alhamdullilah mereka gagal. Jika kumpulan mereka ini lebih besar dan menunjuk sedikit kejayaan, akan ada yang lain yang akan menyertai puak ini.

13. Seruan berjihad mempunyai daya penarik yang amat kuat. Dalam keadaan ramai orang Islam yang cetek pengetahuan Islam, seruan ini mudah diterima. Mereka ini mudah percaya mereka mati syahid bila dibunuh.

14. Sebenarnya orang Islam yang berperang dengan orang Islam dan membunuh mereka, perbuatan mereka ini bertentangan dengan ajaran Islam bahawa orang Islam itu bersaudara. Bukankah Allah s.w.t telah berfirman dalam Al Quran bahawa jika orang Islam bermusuh dengan orang Islam, pihak lain hendaklah merelaikan mereka.

15. Samada Sunni atau Syiah, dalam pandangan orang Yahudi dan Eropah mereka semua Islam dan musuh mereka. Mereka gemar melihat kerja mereka membunuh orang Islam dipermudahkan oleh orang Islam sendiri.

16. Akan ke syurgakah orang yang ghairah membuat kerja Yahudi. Tanyalah ulama dan umarak di negara ini. Berilah kata putus kerana dalam kekecewaan dan kemarahan anak muda Islam kerana negara-negara Islam tidak bertindak menyelamatkan Islam, amat mudah mereka menyahut seruan yang boleh membawa mereka ke neraka dan tidak ke syurga.

17. Selamatkanlah agama suci Islam daripada mereka yang cuba mengubah ajarannya daripada yang mulia kepada yang hina.

NEGARA ISLAM (I.S.)

1. Di Iraq satu gerakan Sunni sedang melanggar dan menawan sebahagian yang tidak kecil dari negara itu. Kita membaca berita bahawa pasukan ini berjaya merampas wilayah ini dengan menewas tentera Iraq.

2. Pasukan IS ini adalah begitu ganas sehingga sanggup menembak mati askar Iraq yang beragama Islam yang ditawan. Kita dapat lihat dalam media alternatif bagaimana tawanan mereka dipaksa duduk sederet dan satu demi satu ditembak dari belakang dan jatuh tersungkur.

3. Video yang dibuat oleh IS sendiri juga menunjuk seorang pemberita Amerika dipancung oleh seorang askar IS yang bertopeng yang dikatakan bercakap Inggeris loghat Timur London. Tuduhan dibuat yang pembunuh ini terdiri dari orang Islam rakyat Britain.

4. Sekarang kita dapat lapuran akhbar bahawa ramai rakyat Malaysia yang sudah ke Syria untuk menyokong pemberontak bagi menjatuhkan Bashar Asaad, Presiden Syria yang menganuti fahaman Islam Syiah (Alawait).

5. Dari Filipina, Indonesia bahkan dari Singapura juga ada orang Islam yang menyertai pemberontak di Syria dan ada yang mungkin terlibat dengan askar Sunni IS.

6. Mengikut laporan TV jumlah tentera IS sudah meningkat lebih dari 30,000. Tiap hari ramai dari pemuda Islam di Eropah dan negara-negara Asia yang meninggalkan negara mereka untuk menyertai IS.

7. Semua ini berlaku di Timur Tengah, jauh dari negara kita. Apakah kita selamat?

8. Tak lama dahulu sepasukan pengganas Filipina telah menceroboh Sabah dan berperang dengan askar Malaysia. Kita berjaya mematahkan serangan mereka. Tetapi kemudian berlaku penculikan dan peras ugut beberapa kali. Hingga kini masih ada yang tidak dapat ditebus.

9. Apakah tidak mungkin sekumpulan dari pemberontak negara jiran membuat serangan untuk mendiri “negara Islam” mereka di Malaysia? Seruan untuk mendiri “negara Islam” amat menarik bagi pemuda Islam di mana-mana sahaja kerana mereka keciwa tidak ada Kerajaan atau negara Islam yang sanggup menyelamat Islam, orang Islam dan negara Islam.

10. Ingatlah anggota IS yang bermazhab Sunni bukan sahaja membunuh tawanan Syiah, tetapi juga Sunni yang dianggap oleh mereka kurang Islam atau tidak Islam kerana tidak mengikuti fahaman mereka.

11. Di Malaysia sudah pun ada orang yang mendakwa kononnya sesetengah orang Islam di negara ini tidak cukup Islam bahkan kafir. Ramai juga dari kumpulan ini sudah ke Syria dan mungkin Iraq untuk berjuang bagi mendiri “negara Islam” dengan membunuh orang Islam lain. Jika terlintas dalam fikiran mereka untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebahagian dari “Islamic State”, apakah tidak mungkin mereka menyertai serangan dari luar yang melaungkan jihad untuk mendiri “negara Islam” di Malaysia.

12. Ingatlah serangan keatas Sabah sudah pun berlaku. Di Semenanjung ada gerakan Al Maunah.

13. Tidaklah begitu sukar bagi mereka bertindak ganas lagi jika ada seruan untuk mendiri negara Islam acuan mereka di negara ini.

14. Kerajaan sehingga kini tidak memandang serius terhadap serangan di Kota Belud. Penculikan masih berlaku. Sekarang pula ada tuntutan untuk pemisahan Sabah. Jika seruan pemisahan ini disamakan dengan perjuangan untuk mendiri Islamic State ramai juga anak muda yang akan terpengaruh.

15. Gerakan untuk mendiri negara Islam dan membaiah kepada seorang yang mendakwa dirinya sebagai khalifah pun sudah berlaku.

16. Jika Ashaari, Ayah Pin dan Tuhan Harun berjaya mendapat sokongan sesiapa yang menyeru untuk mendiri negara Islam tentu lebih mudah mendapat pengikut.

17. Tetapi Kerajaan Malaysia ternampak masih belum sedar. Tidak ada tindakan secara serius yang dibuat. ISA sudah tidak ada.

18. Ingatlah! Tidak siapa menjangka pengganas akan serang Sabah. Tetapi serangan ini sudah pun berlaku.

THE ISLAMIC STATE

1. Suddenly, out of the blue almost there appeared in the Middle East a powerful force seemingly moved by a desire to set up an Islamic state, a Caliphate no less.

2. And this force has been amazingly successful. They have literally conquered swathes of Iraq and have set up a Government. They are set to advance further and the Iraqi forces have not really been able to stop them.

3. Where did they come from? Just like the Taliban they were created by the United States of America.

4. The Americans fear the rise of the Shiites, the Islamic sect that is most against the West.

5. After more than 10 years of the occupation of Iraq the Americans realised they could not stay there any longer. When they left they persuaded the majority Iraqi Shiites to form a bipartisan Government with the minority Sunni.

6. But the Shiites decided to deprive the Sunni of a role in the Government. The Sunni Vice-President was accused of plotting against the Government and he had to escape to Turkey to avoid arrest and possible execution or assassination by the Iraqi Government. And so Iraq which was once ruled by Saddam Hussein, a Sunni became a Shiite State.

7. Then came the uprisings in Syria to overthrow Bashar Assad, a Shiite. America had always wanted to replace Bashar’s Shiite Government with a Sunni Government. With Iraq and Iran under Shiite rule, a Shiite Government in Syria would tilt the balance in the Middle East in favour of the Shiite – the most violent enemy of the American.

8. And so when the attempt was made to overthrow Bashar’s Government, the Americans saw an opportunity to replace Bashar with a Sunni Government.

9. To ensure this would be the result of the civil war in Syria, America provided military aid and money to the Sunni rebels in Syria to ensure their overthrow of Bashar.

10. Many of the Sunni fighters were fanatically against the Shiite. They readily accept United States aid and then decided to cross from Syria into Iraq to overthrow the Shiite Government there. They envision a new Sunni Caliphate to rule over Sham, the territory which was divided by the British and the French into Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine.

11. If the Sunnis succeed in their Islamic state it would endanger Israel and American interest in the region. Suddenly the United States find that overthrowing Bashar is not such a good idea.

12. Instead the United States should ally with Syria to fight against the jihadists from Europe now flocking to join the Sunni Islamic State forces to overthrow the Governments of Iraq and Syria. Should a fanatical Islamic state in Sham materialise, the Americans may find a more implacable enemy.

13. The United States seems unable to learn from the failures of their past strategies. They created the Taliban to fight Russia in Afghanistan. That turned awry.

14. They went to war against Afghanistan and Iraq, believing with shock and awe they would finish victorious in three months. After ten years of costly wars in these countries they have succeeded only in putting in place extremist Muslim Governments. They are now unable to extricate themselves from these two countries.

15. They tried to promote regime change in Arab countries and only succeeded in destabilizing these countries. Democracy ends with anti-Americans extreme Islamic Governments being elected. The United States now finds itself having to support undemocratic overthrows of democratically elected Governments.

16. And now the jihadists of the Islamic Caliphate. Without United States involvement in Middle Eastern affairs the American journalist would not have been beheaded.

17. The American people are hopelessly ignorant of the world outside America. They believe whatever their Governments is doing is good for America. They will never learn simply because their print and electronic media are not under their control.

18. The United States belief that change from authoritarian rule to democracy would result in friendlier Governments is naive. Decades of United States support for Israel and anti-Islamic policies have made anti-American Islamic parties popular. Once elections are held following demoralization, the Islamists would win. And anti-Americanism will be even more violent.

19. America has much to learn about foreign relations.

BRITISH JIHADISTS (Pt 2)

23. I don’t for one moment regard the beheading of the American journalist as Islamic, despite the claim of ISIL. I think it is disgraceful for Muslims to do such thing. It is against the teachings of Islam. But can any young and impressionable Muslim be blamed if they are so easily mislead into committing heinous crimes to avenge the injustice and oppression of their brothers and sisters in religion.

24. It is not the religion of Islam which led the Muslims to committing heinous acts. It is simply anger, hate and rage over not being able to do anything to stop the Europeans or West from oppressing people who profess the same religion as themselves. And Europeans, most of whom are not practicing Christians, react in the same way when Christians are faced with any threat.

25. Look at the record of the Europeans, especially after they created Israel. Now, although they will not admit it, they are carrying out a crusade against Islam and the Muslims. Call it a war on terror or the clash of civilisation. But factually it is still a continuation of the crusade of the past centuries.

26. Against this modern Crusade the Muslims have no answer. They don’t have a Saladin (Salah El Din) to lead them. And over the centuries they have allowed themselves to become weak. They have ignored the injunctions of Allah in the Quran that they must be prepared to defend the ummah and Islam.

27. Their religious teachers tell them to pray to Allah for help. But they neglect to inform that in the Quran Allah enjoins upon Muslims to help themselves first if they want Allah to answer their prayers. Quite obviously the Muslims have not followed this injunction. In fact many believe that it has been preordained that they should suffer European oppression.

28. Today not a single Government of a Muslim country has dared to challenge the European. Indeed many believe that the Europeans are a superior race that they should look up to; that it is futile to defend themselves against European aggression and oppression. Not a single Muslim country dares to stand up to the Europeans.

29. Expecting no help from the Governments of Muslim countries, many angry and frustrated Muslims took upon themselves to take revenge against the hated Europeans. For this purpose they preach their version of the teachings of Islam so as to influence young Muslim to be prepared to sacrifice their lives in a holy war.

30. All Muslims truly believe that to die in the defence of Islam and the Muslims results in martyrdom and heaven in the afterlife. It is not too difficult to convince young Muslims in the face of the injustice and oppression of Muslims that the war against the Europeans is a holy war.

31. But a war against the European promises no easy victory. Seeking revenge through acts of terror is much easier. And so the so-called jihadists are prepared to commit atrocities like beheading a European and recording it for the world to see.

32. I would like to say it again, it is not Islamic this beheading. Certainly it is not Islamic for Sunnis to massacre captured Shiahs or Shiahs to murder Sunnis.

33. The two sects had always fought each other in their mutual belief that the other is not Muslim. But what is happening today is bloodlust which started with the fight against Jewish Zionism and the creation of the state of Israel. Unable to defeat the Jews and their nominally Christian Europeans backers, the Muslims have now turned against each other. And occasionally when they manage to capture a European, they vent their spite on him.

34. This will go on for decades and even centuries, waxing and waning, for as long as there is the state of Israel and the Palestinians are denied their right to a homeland.

35. It is the seizure of Palestinian land to form the state of Israel which triggered the violent reaction of the Muslims in the last 70 over years. The Jewish reaction to the violent struggle of the Palestinians is to out terrorise them. That in turn resulted in other Muslims joining the Palestinian struggle. Unable to wage war they resort to acts of terror. And Israeli state terror escalated.

36. Directly and indirectly the Europeans back Israeli state terrorism. And so it goes on.

37. So what is the solution? It is certainly not more suppression and oppression of the Muslim, and in particular the Palestinian.

38. The solution lies in fairness and justice for the Palestinians.

39. I am writing this in Chechnya, a republic in the Russian Federation. The Chechens fought a war of independence against the Russian. It was a futile war. Three million ill-equipped Chechens against 200 million Russians with one of the most powerful military force in the world. Chechnya and Grozny its capital were razed to the ground before they were forced to stop fighting.

40. After the war the Russians allocated a trillion dollars to rebuild Chechnya and Grozny. Today, eight years after war ended, there is not a trace of the massive destruction caused by Russian missiles and bombs. Instead the whole country, and in particular Grozny has been completely rebuilt.

41. And today the Chechen can once again believe and practice the Muslim religion. Beautiful mosques and religious school abound. There is no more communist sanction against Islam.

42. Chechnya remains a republic in the Russian Federation but in religion and in many ways it is independent. The relation with Russia is friendly.

43. Maybe there is something to learn from the Chechen saga. Stop the oppression of Palestine. Stop the Crusade. Stop postulating the clash of civilisation. Stop regime change. Stop supplying arms for Muslims to fight Muslims.

44. It may take time but slowly the jihadists, will have no incentive to fight.

45. Allah has ordained that the enemy of the Muslims are those who fight and oppress them. Muslims must not war against those who have not attacked them (in any way). That is the way of Islam – peace unless you war against Islam.

46. Muslims who adhere strictly to these tenets and wish to live at peace with non-Muslims can only have credibility and be listened to if the oppression of the Muslims ceases.

BRITISH JIHADISTS (Pt 1)

1. The British are mystified by their Muslim citizens becoming “jihadists” and joining the so-called Islamic State. They are horrified by the beheading of an American journalist by “John” a British citizen and member of the IS.

2. I must admit that I, too am horrified. It is not Islamic at all. Islam does not advocate violence and terror. The people who were defeated by the Prophet were not even converted to Islam, much less executed. The Quran says, “There is no compulsion in Islam.”

3. But we are seeing more and more violence and atrocities committed by Muslims. And now we have the Islamic State “Jihadists”, some of whom come from countries where they had migrated to because life is good there. Having enjoyed the good life, why are these people opting to join revolutionary movements and live dangerous lives, fighting against the very people who are their hosts. Could it be, as some people suggest, that they have been reading books such as “Islam for Dummies?”

4. Why? Recently we saw the mass killings of Muslims and destruction of their homes and towns by Israelis in Gaza. More than 2000 Muslims have been killed. They include little children and old people, non-combatants all. Thousands more have been seriously wounded, many losing arms and legs.

5. No concern or sympathy has been shown by the Europeans and Americans. In fact the Americans gave money and arms for Israelis to kill more Muslims and destroy their homes and towns.

6. If the beheading of European Journalist is evidence of the barbarity of Muslims, cannot there be the same perception of Israeli killings of Muslims in Gaza. No. They are all terrorists, babies included, and a democratic country like Israel has every right to kill them and destroy their homes, towns and cities.

7. If we care to look back, we cannot but acknowledge that the so-called Middle Eastern Muslims were very hospitable to the Europeans before. But, the European nations played their great games there. They created the states of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Palestine out of one single entity called Sham by the Arabs. Muslims then had no nation-states. They only regard themselves as the Muslim community, the Ummah.

8. The Europeans expelled the Turks and proceeded to divide Sham between them, although they had promised the Arabs that Sham would be liberated and handed over to the Arabs.

9. Following the European great games Iraq went to the British while Syria and Lebanon to the French. Palestine was made a British mandated territory to be returned to the Palestinians later. Palestine for centuries had been inhabited by Muslim and Christian Arabs and a small number of Jews. Under Muslim rule they lived in peace despite their different religions.

10. Then the British decided to make a Jewish state out of Palestine in order to solve the Jewish problem in Europe. Balfour, in 1917, promised to give land belonging to the Palestinian to the Zionist. It was so easy. Take other people’s land to give to the Jews without any regard for the majority Arabs living there. And the Jews celebrated the creation of Israel with massacres of Arabs and expulsion from Palestine. This was apparently sanctioned by the UN in 1948 when Israel was recognised as a state. Arab resentment was ignored.

11. Since then the Middle East has experienced no peace. Every time the Palestine Arabs tried to regain their homeland, they were prevented by the massive help and support of Israel by the European nations, in particular by America.

12. With every failure the Arabs became even more angry and determined to regain their homeland.

13. The Arab countries stopped helping the Palestinians. Undeterred, they set up Al-Fatah to throw stones at Israeli soldiers in armoured cars. The stone-throwing children were shot at by the soldiers with rubber coated and then live bullets.

14. Fatah acquired some ineffective weapons to fight in defence. They were shot and killed and thousands were captured and thrown into Israeli jails for indefinite periods without trial. Palestine lands were seized and settlements for Jews built. It was against all laws and practices which the Europeans pride in saying they uphold.

15. And so instead of stopping Israel, the Europeans continued their support with funds and arms. The Israelis actually occupied Palestine land and set up road blocks to control movements of the Palestinian and visitors. Roads were built through Palestinian land for the exclusive use of the Israelis. High walls were constructed in Palestine territory for Israeli security. Gaza is put under siege by Israel. Ships in international waters were seized by the Israeli navy.

16. Aid workers on high seas were shot and killed; their ships boarded and forced to go to Israeli ports. The aid goods were confiscated. All these are against international laws but the big powers did nothing. But these were not all. Anti-Islam and anti-Muslim sentiments and acts were exhibited by Europeans elsewhere also. Having predicted a clash of civilisations they seem bent on making it a reality.

17. In Bosnia Herzegovina 12,000 Muslim men and boys were murdered with axes and bludgeons after Dutch Nato troops who were supposed to protect them simply moved away to allow Serbs to carry out their murderous work.

18. Then came the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq after blaming the Muslim for the destruction of the twin towers of the world trade centre in New York. The Iraqis were not responsible for this. But Iraq was accused of having weapons of mass destruction capable of being launched against Britain within 45 minutes. Later it was admitted by the Brits that this was a lie. Unashamedly the British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who ordered the collaboration with the United States in the invasion of Iraq claimed that the attack, the massive destruction of Iraqi cities and towns and the killings of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis was in order to liberate them from Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein was caught and hanged. But the occupation and war continued. When finally the Americans and Europeans left Iraq, this once stable and progressive Arab country descended into anarchy and civil war with Iraqis killing Iraqis.

19. Afghanistan was invaded to overthrow the Talibans and to kill Osama bin Ladin. Osama is dead but there is no peace in Afghanistan.

20. The Iraqi and Afghan invasion was supposed to be over in three months. But after ten years and the almost total destruction of the two countries, meaningful democracy and peace have not come to these two unfortunate nations. They have been rendered totally unstable and fratricidal wars are tearing them apart.

21. The CIA has drawn up a list of Muslims to be killed. The West condemns the practices of detention without trial. Now we see in the West death sentences being passed on Muslims without trial. The intended victims are not even told about their death sentence. No attempt is made to arrest even. Drones are simply dispatched to kill these Muslims. In the case of Osama bin Ladin killer squads were dropped into Pakistan without even informing that country. And Osama’s body was thrown into the sea, a practice worthy of barbarians.

22. Through all these, the U.S, Britain and other European countries express no regret and certainly no sympathy for the Muslim victims of their war on terror. Thousands of them, men, women, children, babies, old and sick people have been and are being killed without evoking the slightest concern or regret among the Europeans.

SSK dengan 1MDB

1. Saya tertarik dengan tulisan sahabat saya Saleh Said Keruak (SSK) berkenaan 1MDB.

2. Beliau berpendapat 1MDB ialah untuk bantuan dalam bidang pelajaran. Saya akui saya tidak tahu akan kegunaan wang 1MDB untuk pelajaran. Tetapi ada iklan yang menyebut sudah lebih satu juta rakyat dapat bantuan pelajaran dari 1MDB. Bahagi 1 juta dengan 4 tahun ini bermakna 250,000 setahun. Jika benar, Alhamdulillah.

3. Yang saya tahu 1MDB diguna untuk membeli tiga buah stesen janakuasa dari YTL, Ananda Krishnan dan pemilik Jimah power plant di Negeri Sembilan. Harga pembelian lebih tinggi daripada harga pasaran. Kos tidak kurang dari 4 billion Ringgit

4. Baru-baru ini 1MDB akan memiliki sebahagian besar daripada saham stesen janakuasa yang akan dibina oleh Tenaga Nasional dan pihak lain. YTL telah tarik diri. Ramai yang menegur Tenaga kerana projek ini, kerana tidak mengadakan tawaran terbuka.

5. Pembangunan projek Tun Razak Financial Exchange di jalan Tun Razak akan di laksanakan dengan dana 1MDB juga.

6. Selain daripada itu berbillion dollar di urus melalui bank di sebuah Pulau Caribbean.

7. Sahabat saya tentu tahu bahawa dana 1MDB ini berlagak sebagai Sovereign Wealth Fund iaitu dana kekayaan Negara.

8. Banyaklah Negara pengeluar minyak mengadakan sovereign wealth fund daripada lebihan yang didapati setelah menjual beratus juta tong minyak setahun. Kuwait dan Qatar membeli banyak hotel terkemuka dengan wang yang banyak yang ada pada mereka.

9. Malaysia mengeluarkan hanya 650,000 tong sehari dan tidak ada lebihan wang daripada penjualan minyak oleh Petronas. Sebahagian besar keuntungan diserah kepada Kerajaan, selainnya untuk dilabur. Wang yang diserah ini tidak begitu besar.

10. Sebenarnya perbelanjaan Kerajaan lebih daripada pendapatan termasuk sumbangan daripada Petronas. Oleh itu bajet kita menghadapi defisit, bukan lebihan.

11. Duit untuk 1MDB bukan daripada lebihan kewangan Negara. Ia dihutang. Berbillion ringgit dihutang yang menambah hutang Negara dengan amat tinggi. Hutang oleh Negara mesti dibayar. Jika tidak kita akan muflis seperti Argentina. Sebuah Negara yang mengalami deficit tiap tahun tidak mungkin bayar hutang sebesar ini.

12. Biasanya dalam Kerajaan kita mengadakan belanjawan – iaitu catitan wang yang akan diterima oleh kerajaan bagi sesuatu tahun serta wang yang akan dibelanjakan oleh kerajaan pada tahun berkenaan. Pengurusan kewangan Negara perlu ikuti aturan peraturan. Diantaranya ialah kelulusan had siling hutang oleh Dewan Rakyat.

13. Memang saya tidak perhati betul-betul tetapi saya tidak tahu akan peruntukan dalam bajet untuk membeli stesen janakuasa atau pembangunan beberapa projek.

14. Untuk pelajaran kita tidak perlu berhutang. Sejak dahulu lagi kita peruntukkan hampir 25% dari bajet untuk pelajaran. Kita tidak pernah hutang untuk maksud ini.

15. Ada juga cerita-cerita yang merunsingkan berkenaan pembiayaan oleh 1MDB. Saya harap sahabat saya SSK dapat beri butiran lanjut dan dokumen tentang penggunaan 1MDB untuk semua tujuan, termasuk pelajaran.